1dot13/source
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/1dot13/source.git synced 2026-07-22 13:40:22 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

- Bugfix: NCTH - Scope Penalties (by silversurfer)

Browse Source 
o see: http://www.ja-galaxy-forum.com/board/ubbthreads.php/topics/321860/Re_NCTH_Scope_penalties_below_.html#Post321860


git-svn-id: https://ja2svn.mooo.com/source/ja2/trunk/GameSource/ja2_v1.13/Build@6155 3b4a5df2-a311-0410-b5c6-a8a6f20db521
This commit is contained in:
Wanne
2013-06-25 06:30:57 +00:00
parent 911e255bb0
commit fa2fe99b1d
1 changed files with 72 additions and 51 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
Tactical/Items.cpp
+72 -51
View File
@@ -12653,90 +12653,111 @@ FLOAT GetBestScopeMagnificationFactor( SOLDIERTYPE *pSoldier, OBJECTTYPE * pObj,
// Actual Scope Mag Factor is what we get at the distance the target's at.
ActualCurrentFactor = __min(CurrentFactor, (TargetMagFactor/rangeModifier));
// as we only use once scope, we can return from here
return( __max(1.0f, ActualCurrentFactor) );
}
if (TargetMagFactor <= 1.0f)
{
// Target is at Iron Sights range. No scope is required.
return 1.0f;
}
if ( pObj->exists() == true && UsingNewCTHSystem() == true )
{
// Real Scope Magnification Factor from the item
CurrentFactor = __max(1.0f, Item[pObjUsed->usItem].scopemagfactor);
if (CurrentFactor > 1.0f)
// using NCTH system?
if ( pObj->exists() == true && UsingNewCTHSystem() == true )
{
// Actual Scope Mag Factor is what we get at the distance the target's at.
ActualCurrentFactor = __min(CurrentFactor, (TargetMagFactor/rangeModifier));
if (ActualCurrentFactor >= CurrentFactor)
{
// This scope gives no penalty. Record this as the best factor found so far.
// This scope gives no penalty. Record this as the best factor found.
BestFactor = CurrentFactor;
iBestTotalPenalty = 0;
}
else
{
// This scopes gives a penalty for shooting under its range.
// This scope gives a penalty for shooting under its range.
FLOAT dScopePenaltyRatio = (CurrentFactor * rangeModifier / TargetMagFactor);
INT32 iScopePenalty = (INT32)((dScopePenaltyRatio * gGameCTHConstants.AIM_TOO_CLOSE_SCOPE) * (CurrentFactor / 2));
// There's no previous scope to compare with so record this as the best factor for now.
BestFactor = CurrentFactor;
iBestTotalPenalty = iScopePenalty;
}
}
// Now perform the same process for each scope installed on the item. The difference is, we also compare to
// BestTotalPenalty to find the scope that gives the least penalty compared to its bonus.
for (attachmentList::iterator iter = (*pObjUsed)[0]->attachments.begin(); iter != (*pObjUsed)[0]->attachments.end(); ++iter)
{
if (iter->exists() && Item[iter->usItem].scopemagfactor > 1.0f)
{
// Real Scope Magnification Factor from the item
CurrentFactor = __max(1.0f, Item[iter->usItem].scopemagfactor);
if(iBestTotalPenalty < 0 && iProjectionFactor > 1.0f)
BestFactor = 1.0f;
return( __max(1.0f, BestFactor) );
}
// if not using scope modes find the best scope
else
{
if (TargetMagFactor <= 1.0f)
{
// Target is at Iron Sights range. No scope is required.
return 1.0f;
}
if ( pObj->exists() == true && UsingNewCTHSystem() == true )
{
// Real Scope Magnification Factor from the item
CurrentFactor = __max(1.0f, Item[pObjUsed->usItem].scopemagfactor);
if (CurrentFactor > 1.0f)
{
// Actual Scope Mag Factor is what we get at the distance the target's at.
ActualCurrentFactor = __min(CurrentFactor, (TargetMagFactor/rangeModifier));
if (ActualCurrentFactor >= CurrentFactor)
{
// This scope gives no penalty. Is it any better than the ones we've already processed?
if (iBestTotalPenalty >= 0 && CurrentFactor > BestFactor)
{
// This is the best scope we've found so far. Record it.
BestFactor = CurrentFactor;
iBestTotalPenalty = 0;
}
// This scope gives no penalty. Record this as the best factor found so far.
BestFactor = CurrentFactor;
iBestTotalPenalty = 0;
}
else
{
// This scope will give a penalty if used. Is it worth using compared to other scopes found?
// This scopes gives a penalty for shooting under its range.
FLOAT dScopePenaltyRatio = (CurrentFactor * rangeModifier / TargetMagFactor);
INT32 iScopePenalty = (INT32)((dScopePenaltyRatio * gGameCTHConstants.AIM_TOO_CLOSE_SCOPE) * (CurrentFactor / 2));
// Is this scope any better than the ones we've already processed?
if (iScopePenalty < iBestTotalPenalty)
// There's no previous scope to compare with so record this as the best factor for now.
BestFactor = CurrentFactor;
iBestTotalPenalty = iScopePenalty;
}
}
// Now perform the same process for each scope installed on the item. The difference is, we also compare to
// BestTotalPenalty to find the scope that gives the least penalty compared to its bonus.
for (attachmentList::iterator iter = (*pObjUsed)[0]->attachments.begin(); iter != (*pObjUsed)[0]->attachments.end(); ++iter)
{
if (iter->exists() && Item[iter->usItem].scopemagfactor > 1.0f)
{
// Real Scope Magnification Factor from the item
CurrentFactor = __max(1.0f, Item[iter->usItem].scopemagfactor);
// Actual Scope Mag Factor is what we get at the distance the target's at.
ActualCurrentFactor = __min(CurrentFactor, (TargetMagFactor/rangeModifier));
if (ActualCurrentFactor >= CurrentFactor)
{
// This is the best scope we've found so far. Record it.
BestFactor = CurrentFactor;
iBestTotalPenalty = iScopePenalty;
// This scope gives no penalty. Is it any better than the ones we've already processed?
if (iBestTotalPenalty <= 0 && CurrentFactor > BestFactor)
{
// This is the best scope we've found so far. Record it.
BestFactor = CurrentFactor;
iBestTotalPenalty = 0;
}
}
else
{
// This scope will give a penalty if used. Is it worth using compared to other scopes found?
FLOAT dScopePenaltyRatio = (CurrentFactor * rangeModifier / TargetMagFactor);
INT32 iScopePenalty = (INT32)((dScopePenaltyRatio * gGameCTHConstants.AIM_TOO_CLOSE_SCOPE) * (CurrentFactor / 2));
// Is this scope any better than the ones we've already processed?
if (iScopePenalty > iBestTotalPenalty)
{
// This is the best scope we've found so far. Record it.
BestFactor = CurrentFactor;
iBestTotalPenalty = iScopePenalty;
}
}
}
}
}
// Now that we have selected the best available scope, don't use it if we get a penalty and have a functional laser
if(iBestTotalPenalty < 0 && iProjectionFactor > 1.0f)
BestFactor = 1.0f;
}
// Now that we have selected the best available scope, don't use it if we get a penalty and have a functional laser
if(iBestTotalPenalty < 0 && iProjectionFactor > 1.0f)
BestFactor = 1.0f;
return( __max(1.0f, BestFactor) );
}